The difference in rawls and nozick is fundamentally a difference in Essay

The difference in rawls and nozick is fundamentally a difference in what it means to be an indiviudal. what is that difference and how does that difference impact their theories - Essay Example The practice of practice of political and social power should be within the limits of justice. Nozick perspective of justice is a critique of Rawls propositions. Not all members of the society benefit from the social cooperation. Rawls’ theory of justice should be based on the reality that the successful individuals in the society have an upper hand on the less disadvantaged in the society. The reality helps the theory to address diversity better in a liberal society. The theory would assist individuals to orient better in their social world. Nozick’s theory becomes a tool for determining the moral outcomes of individuals in the society. The theory should have a model that can enable people understand society from a broader perspective of justice. Human life is not defined through corruption, prejudice, and cruelty but through free and equality principles (Paul, Miller and Paul